Formuleringen din får meg til å tro at du ikke har lest denne artikkelen fra Businessinsider. Den bør du lese.

"Senior Western official: Links between Turkey and ISIS are now 'undeniable'"

http://www.businessinsider.com/links...eniable-2015-7

Beklager dette. Bloggen er konfus. Den oppgir riktig journalist, men feil link. Her er det som bloggen burde sitert :

"The Army of Conquest is an Islamist coalition that includes the Nusra Front. Often fighting alongside it are more secular groups calling themselves the Free Syrian Army, including some that have received American aid. "

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/08/wo...lict.html?_r=0

Men dette blir altså sagt i en sammenheng der det som kommer ut "Moscow will soon start paying" lyder som en trussel.

USAs allierte er i full fart med å materialisere denne trusselen ved å sende stadig mer våpen til radikale islamister. ( Al Qaida, og så godt som likesinnede islamister. )

Våre allierte er slike folk som dette. ( Denne Bandar bin Sultan var hjernen bak Saudi Arabias finansiering av opprørere de første årene av krigen ) :

"How far is Saudi Arabia complicit in the Isis takeover of much of northern Iraq, and is it stoking an escalating Sunni-Shia conflict across the Islamic world? Some time before 9/11, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, once the powerful Saudi ambassador in Washington and head of Saudi intelligence until a few months ago, had a revealing and ominous conversation with the head of the British Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove. Prince Bandar told him: "The time is not far off in the Middle East, Richard, when it will be literally 'God help the Shia'. More than a billion Sunnis have simply had enough of them." "

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...y-9602312.html
.