Sitat av
Sanjar
https://nij.gov/five-things/pages/deterrence.aspx
Severity refers to the length of a sentence. Studies show that for most individuals convicted of a crime, short to moderate prison sentences may be a deterrent but longer prison terms produce only a limited deterrent effect.
Så for å få til broken window effekten, må du antakelig true med fengselsstraff. Grad av straff betyr altså noe.
For det første er jo det du kjem med der eit prima døme på at dødsstraff neppe er effektivt. For det andre, så let du vere å sitere eit anna vesentleg poeng. Det du let vere å sitere er punkt ein på sida. Altså det øverste. La meg gjere det:
1. The certainty of being caught is a vastly more powerful deterrent than the punishment.
Research shows clearly that the chance of being caught is a vastly more effective deterrent than even draconian punishment.
La meg sitere punkt to og, for det og er jo relevant:
2. Sending an individual convicted of a crime to prison isn’t a very effective way to deter crime.
Prisons are good for punishing criminals and keeping them off the street, but prison sentences (particularly long sentences) are unlikely to deter future crime. Prisons actually may have the opposite effect: Inmates learn more effective crime strategies from each other, and time spent in prison may desensitize many to the threat of future imprisonment.
See Understanding the Relationship Between Sentencing and Deterrence for additional discussion on prison as an ineffective deterrent.
Heck, punkt tre og, når vi først er i gong:
3. Police deter crime by increasing the perception that criminals will be caught and punished.
The police deter crime when they do things that strengthen a criminal’s perception of the certainty of being caught. Strategies that use the police as “sentinels,” such as hot spots policing, are particularly effective. A criminal’s behavior is more likely to be influenced by seeing a police officer with handcuffs and a radio than by a new law increasing penalties.
Og sidan du går god for kjelda, så får vi vel sitere punkt fire og, som og motseier deg:
4. Increasing the severity of punishment does little to deter crime.
Laws and policies designed to deter crime by focusing mainly on increasing the severity of punishment are ineffective partly because criminals know little about the sanctions for specific crimes.
More severe punishments do not “chasten” individuals convicted of crimes, and prisons may exacerbate recidivism.
See Understanding the Relationship Between Sentencing and Deterrence for additional discussion on prison as an ineffective deterrent.
Punkt fem seier at dødsstraff ikkje funker. Eg gidd ikkje sitere det, for eg trur det er åpenbart kva cherrypicking du driv med no. Du har plukka det eine jævla sitatet som passer inn med din argumentasjon, og ignorert at
alt det andre på den sida tvert imot underbygger mitt standpunkt.
Skjerpings!